mobileland
Hi to all,

here is sample what we tested so far:

5 x 1070:
enemy + omegapool
24h avg = 51.4MH/S, max = 61MH/S, min = 42MH/S
for 24h we got 153RVN

nevermore + miningpanda
24h avg = 55MH/S, max = 60.96MH/S, min = 37MH/S
for 24h we got 24h 192RVN
http://www.RavenCoin.World
Quote 0 0
mobileland
8X Nvidia P104
49.5 MH/s 
nevermore/0.2.2
278.5 RVN for 24h

8X Nvidia P104
61.8 Mh/s 
 
87.6 Mh/s  for x16r
miningpanda.site
nevermore/0.2.2
281.2 RVN for 24h
 
Quote 0 0
Charlie
I don't quite get what this testing is supposed to conclude. Could you explain a little what you are trying to achieve?
Quote 0 0
mobileland
Charlie wrote:
I don't quite get what this testing is supposed to conclude. Could you explain a little what you are trying to achieve?


Breaking the biggest barrier to attract miners/contributors ATM is to show them, black on white, Raven can be a good mining coin, stable, with some support, if anyhow applicable. We need to provide assistance to the new members.

There are so many rumors Raven changing ALGO will cause problems with GPU/Electricity consumption and even if you can support ALGO/TEMP/ELECTRO you will face a rip-off from the pools.

Those are the rumors, we need to clarify it. Right?
Quote 0 0
Charlie
It's always good to clarify things yes. But for me I think the tests should be standardized, the same hardware and mining program used on each pool. Even then the amount of RVN gained needs to be taken with a grain of salt as there is some "luck" involved in regards to blocks hit during the time of the test.

Should be interesting to watch 😉
Quote 0 0
mobileland
Charlie wrote:
It's always good to clarify things yes. But for me I think the tests should be standardized, the same hardware and mining program used on each pool. Even then the amount of RVN gained needs to be taken with a grain of salt as there is some "luck" involved in regards to blocks hit during the time of the test.

Should be interesting to watch 😉


Agreed. I just add another rig info which worked on different mining pool. Agreed for the mining pool 'luck' variable as well.
Quote 0 0